proof(luminary099): page 1159
This commit is contained in:
parent
c3ba960480
commit
2735bd52af
@ -27,30 +27,31 @@
|
||||
# 16:27 JULY 14,1969
|
||||
|
||||
# Page 1159
|
||||
# PROGRAM DESCRIPTION -- ENTIRE CONIC SUBROUTINE LOG SECTION DATE - 1 SEPTEMBER 1967
|
||||
# PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - ENTIRE CONIC SUBROUTINE LOG SECTION DATE - 1 SEPTEMBER 1967
|
||||
# MOD NO. - 0 LOG SECTION - CONIC SUBROUTINES
|
||||
# MOD BY KRAUSE ASSEMBLY - COLOSSUS REVISION 88
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION -
|
||||
#
|
||||
# THE FOLLOWING SET OF SUBROUTINES SOLVE VARIOUS PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE TRAJECTORY PRODUCED BY A CENTRAL
|
||||
# INVERSE-SQUARE FORCE ACTING ON A POINT MASS, AS OUTLINED IN THE CMC AND LGC LUNAR LANDING MISSION GSOP, SECTION
|
||||
# 5.5.1.2. A GENERAL USAGE POINT-OF-VIEW WAS TAKEN IN FORMULATING, MECHANIZING, AND SCALING THE SUBROUTINES,
|
||||
# RATHER THAN OPTIMIZING EACH FOR A PARTICULAR USE. THEREFORE, MULTIPLE USAGE CAN BE MADE OF THE SUBROUTINES
|
||||
# INVOLVING ANY REALISTIC SET OF CONSTRAINTS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ONLY ONE SET OF CODING IS USED, WHETHER THE
|
||||
# EARTH, MOON, OR ANY OTHER CELESTIAL BODY IS SPECIFIED AS THE CENTRAL BODY OF THE PROBLEM, PROVIDED ONE OBSERVES
|
||||
# THE INHERENT SCALE CHANGE REQUIRED IN POSITION, VELOCITY, MU, AND TIME, AS OUTLINES IN MISSION PROGRAMMING
|
||||
# DEFINITION MEMO NO. 10. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SIMPLY ADDING TO THE MUTABLE AND INITIALIZING THE SUBROUTINES
|
||||
# APPROPRIATELY.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# THE INHERENT SCALE CHANGE REQUIRED IN POSITION, VELOCITY, MU, AND TIME, AS OUTLINED IN MISSION PROGRAMMING
|
||||
# DEFINITION MEMO NO. 10. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SIMPLY ADDING TO THE MUTABLE AND INITIALIZING THE SUBROU-
|
||||
# TINES APPROPRIATELY.
|
||||
# DUE TO THE UNIFORMITY OF THE EQUATIONS INVOLVED, CODING WAS MINIMIZED BY TREATING INDIVIDUAL EQUATIONS AND
|
||||
# BLOCKS OF EQUATIONS AS SUBROUTINES OF LOWER RANK WHENEVER POSSIBLE. AS A RESULT, THREE BY-PRODUCTS SUBROUTINES,
|
||||
# DIRECTLY USABLE AS INDEPENDENT SUBROUTINES, WERE GENERATED.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# RESTRICTIONS -
|
||||
# THE ONLY LIMITATION IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM WHICH CAN BE SOLVED BY A PARTICULAR SUBROUTINE IS THE SCALING
|
||||
# LIMIT OF EACH PARAMETER AS SPECIFIED IN THE GSOP. THESE SCALING LIMITS WERE CHOSEN SO THAT ALL FEASIBLE TRAJECTORIES
|
||||
# COULD BE HANDLED.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# THE ONLY LIMITATION IN THE SCOPE OF PROBLEM WHICH CAN BE SOLVED BY A PARTICULAR SUBROUTINE IS THE SCALING
|
||||
# LIMIT OF EACH PARAMETER AS SPECIFIED IN THE GSOP. THESE SCALING LIMITS WERE CHOSEN SO THAT ALL FEASIBLE TRAJEC-
|
||||
# TORIES COULD BE HANDLED.
|
||||
# SINCE THE SUBROUTINES (EXCEPT KEPLER) USE COMMON SUBROUTINES OF LOWER RANK WHICH USE ERASABLE OTHER THAN
|
||||
# THE PUSHLIST (DUE TO ITS LIMITED SIZE) AND COMMON INTERPRETIVE SWITCHES, THE CONIC SUBROUTINES CANNOT BE ALLOWED
|
||||
# TO INTERRUPT EACH OTHER. IT IS UP TO THE USER TO GUARANTEE THIS CONDITION.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user